Why Microsoft Must Abandon Vista To Save Itself
Posted by: Scott at 7:56 am in All Things GeekI’m sure this will only appeal to the geeks out there (like me!), but C|Net News.com has an interesting article about how Microsoft has bungled Windows Vista’s launch (the successor to Windows XP) so badly, that the only way to save itself is to abandon Vista completely.
I scored a complimentary upgrade to Windows Vista Home Premium about six months ago. While I don’t completely hate it, I do agree with this author that Vista has many, many minor annoyances that together add up to a bad user experience. I find absolutely no compelling reason for someone to switch from XP to Vista, and I’m not saying that because I’m a Mac enthusiast either. I can’t even upgrade Buckaroo’s computer to Vista because of the heavy system requirements. Perhaps in the future as Microsoft releases more patches, drivers, and service packs, Vista will outshine XP, but that’s not the case now. And as the author points out, some of Microsoft’s Vista mistakes cannot be patched via software.
Why Microsoft must abandon Vista to save itself
By Don Reisinger
September 26, 2007 9:05 AM PDT
While Vista was originally touted by Microsoft as the operating system savior we’ve all been waiting for, it has turned out to be one of the biggest blunders in technology. With a host of issues that are inexcusable and features that are taken from the Mac OS X and Linux playbook, Microsoft has once again lost sight of what we really want.
As we’re more than aware, Vista Ultimate comes at a premium. For an additional $160 over the Premium SKU price, Ultimate gives you a complete backup and restore option, BitLocker Drive encryption, the ever so popular Windows Fax & Scan, and the "Ultimate Extras." But what started with a promise of "Extras" by summer, quickly turned into an apology from Microsoft and the eventual release of DreamScene and Windows Hold ‘Em (among others) today. And while each of the "Extras" runs just fine, Microsoft’s "Extras" blunder is just another reason why the company must abandon Vista before it’s too late.
While Vista was originally touted by Microsoft as the operating system savior we’ve all been waiting for, it has turned out to be one of the biggest blunders in technology. With a host of issues that are inexcusable and features that are taken from the Mac OS X and Linux playbook, Microsoft has once again lost sight of what we really want.













Entries (RSS)
I should mention that if anyone wants some tips on how to score free software upgrades (legally), you can e-mail me. I’m not going to post them on my blog.
If all the companies weren’t so gung ho about using M$’s office products and other windows heavy products, we could all just be using linux and not have to deal with this sad representation of a supposedly good OS.
I’ll certainly agree that Vista isn’t perfect, and the author raises a couple valid points, but most of the article is just the same old exaggerated or false info that every other blog out there by a Mac or Linux zealot is spewing. How can someone in one sentence say that Vista’s driver situation sucks, only to then say Linux is better? If you want to watch content that is protected with DRM, you can’t with a Mac or Linux, at least Vista offers the OPTION. Don’t like UAC prompts, turn them off. Vista’s deployment is low, of course, large companies are still planning their deployments and waiting for SP1 (a standard practice), check back next summer it will be a different story. For many people XP is fine, and I’d only recommend Vista for a new machine, but that doesn’t mean Vista’s no good. It adds up to a bunch of ‘the world is falling’ FUD, which is getting really old.
BTW, on a completely different topic, I noticed you’re using my JPF Quotes plugin. Very cool!
I’m not as much of a geek as I wish to be. But I could tell that it wasn’t going well. I hear no one talking about it. The way folks did when XP came out. I also know no one who has it!
My work laptop came pre-installed with Vista. It’s a total pig, taking minutes to boot, minutes to login and minutes to shut down. While there are some interesting features in Vista, I rarely use it. I’m a Linux aficionado myself, so I mostly run the thing in Linux, which works well except that there’s no wireless driver for the latest kernels.
When IBM opened up the PC architecture, it shot itself in the foot, but look at the benefits to the world. Where would we be today if the PC were still a wholly proprietary system? (This is my biggest beef with Apple, BTW.)
Someday, Microsoft will unclench and begin honestly releasing software in a competitive manner. At that point, maybe Windows can die and we’ll all be better off. I’m encouraged by recent legal developments in Europe.
I’m completely relieved I made the decision to switch back to Mac as a direct consequence of Vista’s arrival on the scene. OS X has matured over the past few years and is a brilliant operating system.
I forgot to let you know I was back blogging again. I’ve actually been back a while now so if you can update your blogroll I’d be grateful, thanks! x
I’m a design guy, so I naturally lean toward Mac and I don’t have any PC with Vista. With that disclaimer, all of the people that I know that are currently running Vista and not bothered by it are all PC gurus — none are common, everyday users. What was supposed to be everyone’s new OS has become a niche product. And with PC’s and laptops still being allowed to ship with XP through the upcoming holiday shopping season, it’ll be another year before Microsoft has an opportunity to try to pull out of their Vista nosedive. And by then it may be too late.
I’d rather just spend an extra $1000 on a Mac and have a computer that actually works. I’m funny that way.
(Our iBook — a first-gen white — 6 years old and still going strong. Our iMac DV — older even than the iBook — also still going. My 2-year-old G4 Powerbook continues to run like a dream.)
I like ice cream!
The newer of my two laptops runs on Vista HP Edition (I’ve had it since June ‘07) - it has been trouble almost from day one and so far I’ve had to two complete re-installs. There are still issues with it - even some software that is said to be Vista copmpliant (for example the ‘Word’ part of MS’s own Office suite, the suite that I bought with the machine) does seem to cause unpredictable conflicts from time to time. The other laptop (which I got in Feb ‘06) and a desktop both use XP - it was stable enough before Service Pack 2 came out, and has if anything got better with SP2. XP has the advantage of allowing me to continue using software that worked with ‘98, which of course was a ‘flaky’ system too, just like Vista is proving to be. None of my older software works with Vista and accessing the data (databases and documents, spreadsheets, etc) is pretty uncertain also, even when created by older versions of MS products. Backward-compatibility is important - and Microsoft has failed to consider this adequately, despite its promises.
I really would like to either retrograde by newer laptop to XP SP2, or even buy another new one with XP (if I could find it - but they don’t seem to sell them any more) and dump my Vista machine and write it off as a foul experience. An alternative I must admit I’m seriously thinking about for my next machine is to go with Apple - I’ve never owned one before, but from all I’ve ever heard they seem to be much more stable and less prone to attack by viruses.
Microsoft do seem to have scored an own-goal with Vista.
I am a freelance techo in New Zealand…I wish M$ would abandon vista, I’m sick of my customers getting new budget laptops that are as said above, “a total pig” - need to be upgraded right out of the box. But every salesman in town is pushing it because the home entertainment/electronics/retailers have no option, only the builders/Dell/oems. So folks are sucked in. Its f-ing tragic. When would M$ ever admit a BLUNDER? we’re dreaming…